As with most religions, most devotees of the religion ignore a lot of whatever is in whatever sacred texts. And then there are theologians of every religion who interpret or re-interpret things in different ways.
Like I said, it's better not to imagine that books, or anybody, speak(s) with the voice of God. Fortunately, most people have better sense in what they do, regardless of what they are told they are supposed to believe. A person's behavior is generally a better indication of what he believes than what he says he believes, or even of what he thinks he believes. Then, too, the fact that words are tricky allows people to say things that they don't understand themselves (e.g., 'the Free World', 'India is a democratic country', 'the U.S. DEFENSE Dept.' etc.)
Quote from a famous 17th-century Muslim Indian poet (forgot his name): "We might as well allow all religions, since God Himself allows them."
When I asked a few pages back if any god ever wrote a biography, it was a rhetorical question, since if god was the creator then there were a few billion years between creation and when those texts were written. Neither could anyone have written a biography of the creator god. They were a product of their time and that time was not that long ago. It's been convenient to go along with the 'word of god' but now that man made text is becoming problematic.
there is the concept of 'divinely inspired', which may or may not be true. eg. maybe Bach's music is divinely inspired?
so certain texts may be divinely inspired. including the bible and koran (maybe), or maybe parts of the books, and maybe it was originally 'divinely inspired' but later tampered with by evil people with hidden agendas. just like revisionist history books.
"Je suis charlie"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wfpm-T3IaHs
BBC NEWS: Paris Shooting Is A False Flag
@Magni: It took me a couple of hours (a few days ago) to find the raw video shown in your link. I searched for it because it didn't look right, no muzzle flash, no recoil, no involuntary jerk of impact and no splatter. I watched the clip I found 20 to 30 times. While I still am not 100% sure of what I am seeing. I also know the clip quality isn't good enough to make a conclusion.
From the angle of the shot, it is possible not to have splatter or an exit wound as the bullet could have gone from the head into the torso. I also thought the sound was a bit exaggerated, think Foley.
AK rounds, 7.62mm, do not produce the kind of damage a M4 or M16, both 5.56mm, rounds. as the velocity is a lot less. I have seen enough wounds not to too surprised that anything can result.
Lastly, the idea these two guys were "highly trained" strikes me as absurd. Other than running around looking unarmed targets while taking no fire, I saw little professional in what they did.
i just watched the video a couple of times. looks a bit suspicious to me, but i don't know.
"As with most religions, most devotees of the religion ignore a lot of whatever is in whatever sacred texts. "
Yep. And denial is a river in Egypt.
www.disclose.tv/[...]
www.disclose.tv/[...]
nothing to do with religion - the guy in the video asks some very velid questions and makes some very good points
You can not convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence; it is based on a deep seated need to believe.
France is the next place for the False Flags. This is what happens to a country that does not follow the agenda prescribed - Say NO to Palestine and Say NO to Putin.
if you want a brand new Toyota pickup - the US is giving them away for free - just say you want to join ISIS.
www.disclose.tv/[...]
