The circular quoted above can also be interpreted so, that only item (3) is subject to interpretation and approval by local tax authorities - Items (1) and (2) are not.
The circular quoted above can also be interpreted so, that only item (3) is subject to interpretation and approval by local tax authorities - Items (1) and (2) are not.
Geezer: Firstly, there isn't always employer in China who would act as tax collector.
Secondly, everyone who earns over 120 000 RMB a year, is required to file separate annual tax return, and it is in this process where additional income such as allowances can be filed. If those allowances are filed with monthly income, I don't know how to process.
Below I will copy summary which I compiled from Chinese government's official English translations, regarding "housing allowance" part of the tax-free allowances,, for another discussion elsewhere.
—————
Roughly speaking, China's legal and regulatory system breaks down to Laws, Regulations, and Circulars. Laws form the high level framework, Regulations detail implementations, and Circulars clarify individual points of concern.
Legal framework for subject of "housing allowance" comes from _Individual Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China_(english.mofcom.gov.cn/[...] which states following:
"For the taxpayer who have no domicile in China but derive wages and salaries from sources within China, or have domicile in China but derive wages and salaries from sources outside China, the additional deduction for expenses shall be allowed on the basis of the average income level, living standard and the changes of exchange rates. the scope of application and amount of the additional deduction for expenses shall be regulated by the State Council."
Those regulations mentioned in the law are: _Regulations for the Implementation of the Individual Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China_ (www.chinatax.gov.cn/2013/n2925/n2956/c310063/content.html).
These regulations describe in more detail, what constitutes "income from wages and salaries":
"Article 8 The scope of the categories of individual income tax provided in Article 2 of the Tax Law:
1. "Income from wages and salaries" refers to income from wages, salaries, awards, year-end bonuses, bonus from labor service, _allowances_ and subsidies and other income related to appointments or employment,"
Thus, default nature of _all _allowances is that tax will be levied on them.
The regulations also clarify which persons are eligible for possible tax-free employment benefits:
"Article 27 The applicable scope of additional tax reductions for expenses as provided in paragraph three of Article 6 of the Tax Law refers to:
1. Foreign nationals working in enterprise with foreign investments and foreign enterprises in China,
2. Foreign experts employed by enterprises, undertakings, social organizations and government institutions in China,
3. Individuals with residence in China but having jobs or being employed drawing wages or salaries outside China,
4. Other individuals defined by the Ministry of Finance."
Further clarifications to these regulations are published in form of circulars, one of which is _Circular on Some Policy Questions Concerning Individual Income Tax_ (www.chinatax.gov.cn/2013/n2925/n2956/c310099/content.html, although my quote below is from another source with slightly different translation).
It states:
"The incomes listed below are exempt from individual income tax for the time being:
(1) Housing subsidies, food allowances, moving fees and laundry fees gained by individual [u]foreigners[/u] in the non-cash form or in the form of being reimbursed for what they spend.
(2) Traveling allowances at home and abroad gained by individual foreigners in accordance with rational standards.
(3) The visiting relatives expense, language training expense and children education expense gained by individual foreigners, that part considered to be reasonable through examination and approval by local tax authorities.
"
—————
Personally I fall in this category:
" Individuals with residence in China but having jobs or being employed drawing wages or salaries outside China"
Which makes me eligible to these tax-free allowances. Since I have no local employer, I must file (and study) everything myself - which I by the way do annually with the same process that everyone earning over 120 000 must do even if their taxes would get filed monthly by employer.
Still, employers (local or abroad) cannot pay lump sump allowances without it being considered fully taxable - everything must be paid against fapiaos or other documents based on real expenses.
Tigertiger: As it says _visiting_ relatives, I am quire sure that it means the "left behind" family which did NOT move to China with you, and their subsequent visits to come see you in Chiina on temporary basis.
Relocation costs (for the entire household), as well as some other expenses are covered under different items in the policy.
I only quoted item number 3 here, and am only interested in the definition for "visiting relatives expense".
Geezer: These are items which can be paid by employer to the employee, and employee can deduct these expenses from taxable income, IF the specific items are mentioned in work contract and there are relevant fapiaos.
And if you are eligible for these tax-free allowances to begin with, which depends on a few factors (which are clear to me).
China's regulations about tax exempt allowances for eligible foreigners include this:
"(3) The visiting relatives expense, language training expense and children education expense gained by individual foreigners, that part considered to be reasonable through examination and approval by local tax authorities."
Would anyone have experience about the "visiting relatives expense" in Kunming, as these items are subject to approval by local tax authorities rather than on national level.
Firstly, are there some limitations to what constitutes "relatives" - only spouse, or also parents, siblings, grand children, nieces and nephews...?
Secondly, is this limited to local expenses such as food and accommodation, or does it also include flights/other transports from/to home country and/or within China?
Any first-hand knowledge or even hearsay would be welcome.
www.china.org.cn/english/LivinginChina/204171.htm
"According to the Administrative Rules of the People's Republic of China on Cross-Border Transportation of National Currency issued by China's central bank in December 2004, travelers are allowed to take up to US$5,000 equivalent of foreign currency and 20,000 yuan of local currency (US$1=7.7 yuan) into or out of the country.
There is no need to declare this to customs if the currency you carry is less than the limit. "
No results found.
Bullet train to Dali to begin running July 1
Posted byOn our trips to wife's hometown in rural Baoshan, we've pretty much had to spend a night in hotel in Dali on the way, before taking a bus west to Yongping and then shared car south to rural Baoshan in the following day.
Sometimes it's a choice though, because there are friends to see in Dali - but more often necessity.
With this new train, we may be able to take early train to Dali, and have enough time to get to Yongping and to our final destination within same day.
So for us, and I believe many western Yunnanese who make way home, this will mean opportunity to skip more of Dali.
A look at Yunnan's evolving anti-drug strategy
Posted byWhat has probably changed in last few years, is that local authorities are increasingly offering cash rewards to citizens who report any kind of suspicious activities by foreigners - be it drugs, prostitution, or spying.
In interview, Yunnan Party chief stresses ending poverty
Posted byOverall, my opinion about "socialism with Chinese characteristics" is that the "Chinese characteristics" should be limited to absolute single party rule in Beijing to decide laws and the directions that the country goes.
Implementing those laws should (and are) left to local level governments, and these local level governments should be accountable to the people.
These officials do not need be democratically elected, but they should serve the people democractically.
The people should hold local government officials accountable for implementing the decisions that dictators in Beijing dictate. This is where the democracy in China should thrive. The people should have direct channels to Beijing to report failures of local officials, and Beijing should be quick to respond.
People shouldn't even have a need to go to barricades, if they could trust the supposedly strong central government to deal with issues.
This does absolute not mean that the rule of party would decrease - it would increase, through and for the people. The central government will become stronger, when they don't have to watch inefficient local officials holding posts that they don't deserve.
They implement this accountability retroactively now, and Yunnan is no stranger to this. Development toward society with people first will also mean officials being accountable first and not sometime later.
And I believe that the system will naturally develop to that.
Anti-corruption campaign has changed the picture, where those who want easy life with kickbacks and gifts aim for official positions with capacity to receive them. Increasingly it is so, that those who really want to serve the people even consider these positions.
A smart to-be official like this will eventually perhaps voluntarily ask the people if they want him to take the post to begin with. And that's not far from western-like democracy, even if no formal elections ever take place and the important decisions keep being made by dictators in Beijing.
Foreign observes can keep commenting about those decisions made in Beijing to end of days, while China should ignore that and not fuel the fire by having the decisions (whether good or bad) not properly carried through local levels.
This is increasingly important now, when structural changes (of which many can not be expected to be popular with all components of society) are required to float the ship.
For Chinese, the country being a dictatorship of the party would be better than a being broken dictatorship of the party, that it has been in past.
In interview, Yunnan Party chief stresses ending poverty
Posted by@nnoble: "Why should anyone assume that China aspire to become democratic or why 'democracy' should be considered a suitable system of governance for China?"
Now you are incorrecly assuming that choice between democracy or any other system is a black and white decision that defines the entire governing system of a country.
Even China does have some democracy in grassroots (rownship etc) levels, and increasing this kind of democracy does not mean abandoning the rule of the party or socialism with Chinese characteristics. The opposite in fact - well measured moves to increase democracy in select areas can strengthen the rule of the party.
Simple truth is that when people get sufficiently fed and housed, their minds start to wander to what else they should or could get.
Should they be wanting KTVs and KFCs, or guarantee that now they have proper housing, they won't have to move again just because some businessman from Zhejiang wants to build a dam or a mine right in that spot - with or without their permission, with or without proper environmental guards.
In interview, Yunnan Party chief stresses ending poverty
Posted byAlso there are some possible positive consequences that could be expected from removing poverty in China. It is clearly an area where the state is putting lot of money and resources, and once that is done, what next?
Optimists could expect the country's self esteem and confidence to raise from "job well done", which could release political will to liberal reforms - further increase rule of law, civil society, or even democracy.
But an unavoidable next step is to build support to the aging population.
So just as important as removing poverty is, possibly even more important is to get it done so the country can move to other things.