I think, with Chinese teenagers especially, you need to behave in a somewhat casual manner - one of the problems of Chinese English-language teachers is, I think, too much formality, too much as an authority figure - learning a language is not just a matter of individually mastering some sort of rules, it's about interaction. The idea of 'forcing' them to give some response is not wrong, but it is easily overdone in a culture where pinning an individual down in front of his/her peers makes everybody freeze up and want to hide, so smile or be a bit casually humorous when you insist on answers from the picked-out individual whom you are putting on stage in front of everybody. Suggest you try to get somewhat loose conversation going (no, not so easy, but a lot will depend on your behavior as a not-too-authoritarian figure), mix it with some relevant non-threatening group repetitions of sentence structures and so forth. And you don't need to use a textbook, necessarily, but you do have to put in a little planning before class, so that you can lead into and away from individual responses by the use of some related structural practices, and/or throw in relevant grammar points. The most important thing to do is to get students to relax - note that every student in China has studied some English and very few of them become comfortable enough to experiment with it in any 'natural' manner, and most feel they're lousy with English and dislike studying it - and these things are mutually reinforcing.
I'm not criticizing anything you are presently doing because I don't know what it is, but the above is what has worked for me, for Chinese students. A little vague, perhaps, but remember, it's partly an acting job, on your part.
How many students in the class? The more there are over the number of about fifteen the harder it is to do this, and, well, that's a problem.
Their being under pressure for the gaokao is particularly a problem for oral language classes.


A look at Yunnan's evolving anti-drug strategy
发布者@vicar: Where is it that people snatch handbags to get weed? And who told you that it is addictive?
I like to drink, but it's probably healthier to smoke weed than to drink, at least to drink to excess.
Belt and Road pushing Yunnan companies international
发布者55 years seems to me to be a helluva long time for a foreign private(?) company from an economically and politically powerful country to run an airport in a weak one.
A look at Yunnan's evolving anti-drug strategy
发布者@dudeson: weed leads to addiction - I think not, though it may become habitual, but that is not the same thing. As for leading to hard drugs, alcohol - which, in fact, IS a harder drug - might also, but if weed statistically does so more often it's because both weed and certain harder drugs are all thrown into the same category: illegal. Then you have the naive kid told not to do 'drugs', one day he sneaks & does weed, no problems; his next experiment may well be with hard drugs.
That's why, above, I say the way 'drugs' are categorized - miscategorized, actually - is dangerous.
I think we agree, maybe I've just read you wrong.
A look at Yunnan's evolving anti-drug strategy
发布者Nobody snatches handbags to buy weed either.
A look at Yunnan's evolving anti-drug strategy
发布者The point is that using the term 'drugs' for anything that happens to be illegal is dangerous. Weed is closer to beer than it is to heroin.
Somebody define 'drugs', clearly. Should we outlaw tea?