@Cynthia: translation lacks perfection. It always has and it always will. Of course, it's usually pretty clear and accurate when the words are concrete nouns, but so much of translation involves abstract nouns ('freedom', 'happiness', even words like 'god') - and then there are the precise usages of English pronouns, articles, etc., which seem to drive many English-language learners crazy. as well as not a small number of native-English-speaking 10-year-old children.
I once attended an excellent lecture by a Chinese person who spoke in English about Chinese poetry. It was brilliant, and it became very apparent that there is simply no way to translate a Chinese poem in some 'perfect' way. Same is true for all languages. And don't count on the development of machines who appreciate poetry.
Another thing about using a language is that the facial expressions and gestures are important parts of the communication, and are best understood in conjunction with the language itself - so writing and reading never completely replace speech, conversation, spoken dialogue or argument (or even insult, joking, etc.)
Hey, it sounds like an interesting movie though.

@kevindeen: Secretly? How so?

@Stratocaster: Common ground: I didn't, and wouldn't, vote for Hillary either.
So we agree on that.
As for immigration, SOME controls might make sense.
So we agree on that too.
And I don't go for dynasties in politics either.

@Geezer: Well, ok, that's one.

@Geezer: Doesn't show the majority of the population likes Donald Trump.
@dazzer: I don't get what you're saying.