Forums > Living in Kunming > GoKunming feedback...
As you mentioned me I decided not to ignore your opinion and ideologically driven comments. To make your point you conflate my views on Climate Change, which is a debate on scientific observation and interpretation, and my slight preference for Trump over Clinton. Your logic is interesting as much as it is faulty.
On Trump; I was, prior to his nomination, a never Trump guy. After his nomination, my Classical Liberal, or Jeffersonian Liberal, thinker and as I am a seeker of Liberty and Freedom, I concluded that Trump was the lessor bad choice.
In the nearly 22 months in office, Trump has led the US to these results: Lowest ever black unemployment rate, lowest ever Hispanic unemployment, lowest women unemployment in 60 years, the Korean War is over, the US economy is doing quite well, taxes at 60 year low, ISIS obliterated, US is becoming energy independent.
My opinion of the Trump persona has not changed much but he has been effective. I can live with more people working, fewer people on food stamps, and people of color and all Americans doing better.
Where is the conspiracy?
As to Climate Change, well, climate has been changing for at least 4 billion years without human input and it will continue to change regardless of what humans do.
Debating the science of Climate Change, or Paleontology, is a worthy endeavor. In as much as science is a mode of inquiry the debate ought to be on the facts, observations and interpretations of the results of scientific inquiry.
Full disclosure: I know relatively little of climate science or Paleontology but I am curious enough to read, watch videos, and with the time I have I do a lot of both.
In either of these discussion there is a lot of opinions held. There is no “science” in name calling, or maligning opinions, or disparaging how opinions, or who holds them, are arrived at. There is no “science” in opinion polls, save in methodology, or in consensus claims. The “scientific mode of inquiry” actually demands doubt, skepticism and further research.
If you doubt this, it is best to remember it was once the consensus was that the sun revolved around a flat earth. It is consensus that can be wrong or dangerous.
@lemon, your forum tactic is ideology driven. You conflate topics and opinions recklessly. You create nonexistent relationships, ascribe them to those you disagree with, then ridicule both your asserted nonsense and those you have tagged.
I believe you when you say free speech has nothing to do with it. You simply do not want anyone with an opinion on climate, fossils, dinosaurs, politics or Trump to express them. Bagging opinions and ideas you dislike into the conspiracy (pejorative) bag may satisfy your need to castrate opinions but doesn’t convince anyone that thinks.